[rnate]

rnate on June 24, 2020 at 3:08 pm · in reply to: In-between Training Cycles #43032

Thank you Scott.

[rnate]

rnate on February 24, 2020 at 4:33 pm · in reply to: Another Aerobic Threshold Test Question #38713

Wow!
Thank you so much for your expertise and for taking the time to interpret my test.

I was totally uneducated about how the RER value was the determining factor for the heart rate zones. So to recap, the point at which RER is sustained above .85 is AeT and an RER of 1.0 is AnT?

So, AnT is 165 and AeT is 145, the difference is greater than 10%. I should still be focusing on curing myself of ADS and stop all high intensity training?

Why would you use 141hr over 145hr?

Thank you so much for your time.

[rnate]

rnate on February 20, 2020 at 12:37 am · in reply to: Another Aerobic Threshold Test Question #38465

Test results

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[rnate]

rnate on February 19, 2020 at 7:34 pm · in reply to: Another Aerobic Threshold Test Question #38441

So, I went and got lab tested. The results are still a little iffy to me. According to the heart rate zone portion of the test, Aet is 145 and Ant is 160.

The problem I have in when I look at the numbers the inflection point seems to be at a heart rate of 141 at 14:30. I’m not really sure how it calculated my Ant. Take a look.

Thanks

[rnate]

rnate on February 13, 2020 at 4:00 pm · in reply to: Making Alterations to the Plan #38137

Yes and no, I’m doing a local half marathon the beginning of April and a 50k at the end of April. I’m a big fan of the long run, I’d be happy to condense all the running down to two days, just run 20 milers, with 3 to 4 recovery days in-between. Being able to spend 4 to 6 hours running in the mountains is more of an end goal for me than the races themselves.

So as long as I feel like I’ve recovered sufficiently from the last long run then I’m not hurting any thing by condensing the weeks mileage? I would still use the plans mileage per week as a guide to keep me from overtraining and for when to taper.

Thanks

[rnate]

rnate on February 1, 2020 at 10:25 am · in reply to: Another Aerobic Threshold Test Question #37215

Well, here it is. I did a 20 min warm up and I nose breathed through the entirety of the 1 hour 23 sec. run.

http://tpks.ws/UXH4QNIGEW5E6LXTM7Q4SF3ZVA

Training Peaks Pa:Hr 0.07%
My target AeT heart rate was 145
My average HR was 146
My max HR was 153

This was a GPS AeT test, not a treadmill AeT test. So am I correct in that I should see a drop in my pace with a constant heart rate? It should be the opposite from the treadmill test where you would see an increase in heart rate with a constant pace?

Anything under 5% is supposedly under AeT? I’m at 0.07%, so my actual AeT would be higher?

In the 10% test, my AnT of 162-16=146? My AeT to AnT ratio should be 10% or less?

Thanks

P.S. I’m going to get professionally tested soon.

[rnate]

rnate on January 31, 2020 at 11:12 am · in reply to: Another Aerobic Threshold Test Question #37177

Thanks for your expertise Scott,

It definitively looks like you were right about my AeT Test results, HR 160, actually being my AnT, HR 162.

I did my Anaerobic Threshold Test this morning.
I started with a 20 min warm up.
I then ran at my maximal effort for 31 mins. 19 sec. average HR 162.
AnT HR 162

Below is the TP link:

http://tpks.ws/2ZSIIRNKV3S6OIKDMI64OHJ72U

It looks like I should try for an AeT Test with a target HR 145 to 150.

Thanks Scott

[rnate]

rnate on January 29, 2020 at 9:44 pm · in reply to: Another Aerobic Threshold Test Question #37090

Thanks Scott, I’ll be doing an Anaerobic Test in the morning. I will post the results.

[rnate]

rnate on January 23, 2020 at 4:43 am · in reply to: Half Marathon Training vs. 50K Training #36756

I’ll carry on the good fight then!

Thank you