George, Roughly half of the mountaineering athletes I work with are runners and half are not. Both groups train effectively with some consideration. For me the best thing about running is the simple ability to train at a target HR in almost any terrain if need be. It is almost functionally impossible for a very fit individual to keep their HR in Upper Zone 2 for an extended period of time on flat ground with a walking gait. A runner can do that easily. Thus the non-runner needs to find hilly terrain and/or use gym based machines to hit target HR. As you mention above running actually isn’t perfectly sport specific for carrying a big pack at high altitude so it can’t be the totality of training in the later phases. Even the most dedicated runner will want to transition a good sized chunk of their training volume to hiking centric training in order to be the best prepared. A lot of runners will mix run/hike outings on rolling terrain where they’re hiking the ups and jogging the downs and flats to keep their HR in the desired zones with other days where they are hiking with a weighted pack for sport specificity. This mix will produce solid results for most folks who like to run as part of their program.
Wondering what your thoughts are on this topic? There are many ways to run, and I am guessing that trail running on hilly terrain is closer to mountaineering objectives than flat ground. Hiking resembles the real activity more closely, and is perhaps easier on the knees? Can we treat steep trail running as a more intense and potent version of hill hiking?
Any thoughts on how to mix and incorporate the two activities into training for different kinds of objectives (e.g. long expeditions vs. 1-2 day blitzes) would be appreciated!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.