I want to understand the connection between base training and all the other elements of improving fitness.
I realized recently that my fitness has been plummeting over the past few years because being time crunched has led me to focus on high intensity events rather than the naturally slow paced distance events I used to do on my own that previously established a small base inadvertently.
I am now in my 6th month of carnivory (only way I can eat high fat without relapse I’ve found) and I want to know what is different about building a base with: high fat + cold exposure + sunlight + near IR + circadian alignment. Ueli Steck said if takes 5 years to build endurance and presumably that meant base training. Do these things get the same results in 3 years, or is it that 80% of the aerobic base improvements of maximum individual potential can be built in half the time? I know people on sugary high carb diets who are more fat adapted than me just because they have a huge aerobic base.
I can see all the blogs and papers talking about benefits of fasted or fat burning training with AMPK, PGC-1a etc, but that does not give me a good sense of what I can expect with months of base training. Is it simply that while LCHF, I will be able to go for longer in zone 2 efforts (while aerobically deficient, then zone 1 for base) than I would otherwise and get a stronger training effect from that or are other aspects?
I just want to get my aerobic base to the point where I can mountain bike ~12 hours per day or be bagging peaks for many days at a time and I want to know how much faster that can be by essentially getting more leveraged adaptations to base training.
Posted originally in Barry Murray’s FB group, The Connected Athlete, in case anyone else is there. https://m.facebook.com/groups/486866895180210?view=permalink&id=526685447865021&comment_id=526784821188417&ctoken=526685447865021_527114301155469&ft_ent_identifier=526685447865021&gfid=AQBrK_xRsyXSO-F_¬if_t=group_comment_mention¬if_id=1557239820750521&ref=m_notif