Losing fitness in zone 2? | Uphill Athlete

Losing fitness in zone 2?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #71712
    BoatIt
    Participant

    Hello! I’ve been running exclusively in zone 2 to build an aerobic base (HR in the low-mid 140s, between 25 and 40 miles per week). I initially saw some improvement in my pace in the first 4-6 weeks but since then I’ve lost those gains and have been moving backwards. I was wondering if anyone’s seen this pattern before or if it’s just one of those cycles we all go through sometimes?

    Anywhoo, I’ve attached a graph with my paces and corresponding heart rate; curious to hear others’ experiences.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
  • Participant
    josswinn on #71714

    Hi,

    There are a number of things to consider if you want a meaningful comparison between runs:

    Are you using a chest strap for accurate recording of HR?
    Are you running the same route with the same changes in elevation?
    Are you running the same time of day and similarly hydrated and fed?
    Is the temperature the same for each run?
    Is the wind the same for each run?
    Is your day to day stress the same?

    Each of these will affect HR and some will affect pace. As you can see, comparing the two as you are, isn’t the right way to benchmark progress or lack of it. Try to benchmark once a month or every couple of months, when all of the above are comparable.

    For comparison, I’ve attached an image of my average HR and pace for all runs over the last 10 months.

    I’m definitely fitter now than I was in January and at a race at the end of August, knocked three minutes off the previous year’s time. My average HR (which matched my AnT) and max HR for the race was exactly the same as last year but I was quicker. However, my day to day pace and HR are not comparable for all the reasons above.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    Participant
    BoatIt on #71717

    Thanks, you’re probably right that a real benchmark would require a bit more rigor. But as is I don’t think this is *too* bad a dataset; there are only 2-3 routes here, at roughly the same time of day, recorded with a chest strap. I guess the punchline is to keep at it…maybe my real question is, is 30-40 miles/week of pure zone 2 work the best way to build a base?

    Participant
    dcgm on #71723

    OP, yeah, I’ve noticed pretty much the same thing and don’t have a good explanation for it. I was keeping pretty good track of the usual environmental variables and not really getting faster at the same HR–if anything, I was getting slower and RPEs were dropping, it felt like I was having to shuffle to stay on Z2 whereas at the beginning of the cycle I was running at a not-hard-but-not-easy pace, and of course I was going measurably slower as well. My first hr drift test yielded an AeT HR of 150 bpm at right under 10:00/mile and I was doing training runs at like 145 bpm and 11:30-12:00 mile.

    However, I tried an HR drift test targeting pace (9:15ish/mi), RPE (see above) and breathing (deep but slow and nasal) and actually saw negative drift at an average HR of 165, getting faster at the same HR over an hour effort. My pace:hr did not improve, but my sustainable pace did (for the same formalization of sustainability.). I also had pretty robust AnT numbers at the time, and I was confident that I hadn’t accidentally found my AnT (I mean, breathing, RPE, etc. all pointed in the direction of a valid AeT result, but it’s nice to have the AnT results to validate that as well.). I spent the rest of the cycle training off 165 bpm as AeT HR, and all in all it was reasonably succesful.

    I don’t think I’ve heard of this happening to anyone else, and I don’t really have any serious theories for why it could have happened (too much weightlifting in my formative years –> little or no eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy?? the answer will shock you!), but it seems pertinent enough to be worth mentioning. Scott Johnston told me that pace and rpe dropping at a given HR is a sign of undertraining–I don’t believe this was my problem, but maybe if running is only a small part of a guy’s aerobic training volume he could undertrain running specifically while still doing quite a lot. But I don’t know if that even applies to you. Conversely, pace dropping and RPE increasing at a given HR is probably a sign of overtraining, but you’re better equipped than I am to evaluate whether that’s a reasonable possibility for you.

    Participant
    BoatIt on #71735

    @dcgm Thanks, it’s nice to hear your experience here too. I think I’m going to do another AeT test and see where I land; probably a good idea anyway because my perceived effort is a good bit lower than it was a few months ago. One thing I also didn’t mention is that I run on fairly technical trails which slows things down quite a bit — I wonder if there’s some consequence of running slow yet at the target HR.

    Participant
    dcgm on #71753

    That’s an interesting point. I was probably getting at least half of my weekly aerobic training volume (weekly long effort, 1-2 shorter midweek sessions) from hill laps on trails during the training cycle I described. Something something running economy/fitness/fatigue….

    Participant
    Dada on #72398

    Hi,

    What comes to my mind:

    – this is quite a lot of volume in Zone 2. The more you get trained the more upper zone 2 gets no man’s land -> so watch out for overtraining
    – was there anything specific between run 24 and 26? There seems to be a major structural break. Covid?

    What’s your AnT btw?

    Cheers

    Participant
    BoatIt on #72448

    @Dada I think you might be right; I might be training too close to the top of zone 2 and bleeding into zone 3. I recently did a gas exchange test and my AeT came back at 141bpm. I’m trying to stay around 130-135bpm now (some of those runs have average HRs of ~145).

    Nope, no major changes from run 24-26 (that sudden change in performance is what prompted this post). I did in fact test for covid a couple times but came back negative.

    My AnT (top of zone 4?) was measured at 179bpm in that same test.

    Participant
    Dada on #72487

    With that big AeT/AnT gap, training below AeT should not cause overtraining. But yes try to stay below AeT and check. Maybe have a rest week and report back.

    Have you introduced ME workouts lately?

    Participant
    BoatIt on #72539

    Seems like a good idea, I’ll take a week-ish off.

    I only just recently introduced a handful of 20 second pickups into my runs — recently enough that I don’t think I can whether I feel differently or not. Do you recommend I keep doing them?

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • The forum ‘General Training Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.